Mistral Medium 3.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
Mistral Medium 3.1 comes from Mistral and MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
MiMo-V2-Flash holds more in a single conversation — 256K tokens against 128K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiMo-V2-Flash is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.10 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | Mistral Medium 3.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Xiaomi |
| Model ID | mistral-medium-latest | mimo-v2-flash |
| Context window | 128K | 256K |
| Max output | 8K | 64K |
| Input price | $0.40 / 1M tokens | $0.10 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $2.00 / 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, file, audio | text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | Free | Premium |
Which should you use?
Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 when…
- You need image and file and audio input, which the other model does not accept.
- You are on the free plan — this model is included without an upgrade.
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash when…
- You need the larger context window — 256K against 128K.
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.10 / 1M tokens versus $0.40 / 1M tokens.
- You want longer single responses — up to 64K output tokens.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Mistral Medium 3.1, MiMo-V2-Flash, and every other model on the platform.