DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Command A Reasoning
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
DeepSeek-V3.2 comes from DeepSeek and Command A Reasoning from Cohere. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Command A Reasoning holds more in a single conversation — 256K tokens against 128K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
DeepSeek-V3.2 is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.03 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Command A Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Cohere |
| Model ID | deepseek-chat | command-a-reasoning-08-2025 |
| Context window | 128K | 256K |
| Max output | 8K | 32K |
| Input price | $0.03 / 1M tokens | $5.00 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42 / 1M tokens | $20.00 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text | text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | Free | Premium |
Which should you use?
Pick DeepSeek-V3.2 when…
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.03 / 1M tokens versus $5.00 / 1M tokens.
- You are on the free plan — this model is included without an upgrade.
Pick Command A Reasoning when…
- You need the larger context window — 256K against 128K.
- You want longer single responses — up to 32K output tokens.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you DeepSeek-V3.2, Command A Reasoning, and every other model on the platform.