Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning)
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
Claude Opus 4.7 comes from Anthropic and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning) from DeepSeek. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Claude Opus 4.7 holds more in a single conversation — 1M tokens against 128K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning) is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.03 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.7 | DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Model ID | claude-opus-4-7 | deepseek-reasoner |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
| Input price | $5.00 / 1M tokens | $0.03 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $25.00 / 1M tokens | $0.42 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image | text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | Premium | Free |
Which should you use?
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 when…
- You need the larger context window — 1M against 128K.
- You want longer single responses — up to 128K output tokens.
- You need image input, which the other model does not accept.
Pick DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning) when…
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.03 / 1M tokens versus $5.00 / 1M tokens.
- You are on the free plan — this model is included without an upgrade.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Claude Opus 4.7, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Reasoning), and every other model on the platform.