Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comes from Google and MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds more in a single conversation — 1.0M tokens against 256K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiMo-V2-Flash is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.10 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Model ID | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | mimo-v2-flash |
| Context window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 64K |
| Input price | $2.00 / 1M tokens | $0.10 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $12.00 / 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | — |
| Input types | text, image, audio, video, file | text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | Premium | Premium |
Which should you use?
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when…
- You need the larger context window — 1.0M against 256K.
- You want longer single responses — up to 66K output tokens.
- You need image and audio and video and file input, which the other model does not accept.
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash when…
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.10 / 1M tokens versus $2.00 / 1M tokens.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, MiMo-V2-Flash, and every other model on the platform.